USDC$74.2B ▲
USDT$121.4B ▲
US→BR median fee0.38% ▼
New listings 7d0
MethodologySign in
Licences/New York, United States/NYDFS BitLicense

NYDFS BitLicense

New York, United States regime for crypto services. NYDFS issues the authorisation. Typical lead time is 12–24 mo. Tags on company profiles are checked against public registers before they publish.

Holders in directory
18
Typical lead time
12–24 mo
Corridors unlocked
16
Register last checked
28 OCT 2026
What it permits
✔Virtual currency business activity involving New York persons
SOURCE · NYDFS + PUBLIC REGISTERS, CHECKED 28 OCT 2026
The short answerREGISTER CHECKED 28 OCT 2026

18 companies in the directory hold NYDFS BitLicense, with holders concentrated in United States, Cayman Islands, Israel, Japan and Luxembourg. It permits virtual currency business activity involving New York persons. Typical lead time is 12–24 mo.

Cite: The Stablecoin HQ, NYDFS BitLicense holders, Oct 28, 2026 (registers checked 28 Oct)
Companies holding this authorisation18 in the directory · evidence checked
A
Anchorage Digital Bank
Federally chartered crypto bank
B
Bakkt
Crypto and stablecoin infrastructure
B
bitFlyer
Japan's largest bitcoin exchange
B
BitPay
Crypto payment processing for merchants
B
Bitstamp by Robinhood
The original crypto exchange, now part of Robinhood
B
Block (Square, Cash App)
Square, Cash App and bitcoin products
B
Bullish
Institutional exchange and owner of CoinDesk
C
Circle
Issuer of USDC and EURC, the regulated digital dollar and euro
C
Coinbase
Largest US crypto exchange and USDC distribution partner
C
Cumberland DRW
Institutional crypto liquidity
E
eToro
Social investing platform with crypto
G
Galaxy
Digital assets and data centers
12 of 18 shown
Filter the directory by this licence tagOPEN IN BROWSE →
NYDFS BitLicense · regime briefingRESEARCH DESK10 UNIQUE DATA POINTS · 15% SHARED

What NYDFS BitLicense actually signals

New York, United States regime for crypto services. NYDFS issues the authorisation; for a buyer it signals which regulated activity a provider claims on its profile.

18 companies in this directory hold NYDFS BitLicense, concentrated in United States, Cayman Islands, Israel, Japan and Luxembourg. Each tag links to the regulator's public register where a reference is supplied. Typical lead time is 12–24 mo.

The register entry matters more than the marketing label. Check which entity name is authorised, which activity scope is listed, and whether the permission is still in force before you treat the tag as compliance approval.

Holders listed
18
Lead time
12–24 mo
Corridors unlocked
16
Register checked
28 Oct

What the authorisation does and does not permit

Read against CASP authorisation, which is routinely confused with it.

Virtual currency business activity involving New York persons
NYDFS BitLicense: yesCASP authorisation: no
Public register entry required
NYDFS BitLicense: yesCASP authorisation: yes
Entity name must match register
NYDFS BitLicense: requiredCASP authorisation: required
Covers every jurisdiction globally
NYDFS BitLicense: noCASP authorisation: no
Passportable across member states
NYDFS BitLicense: n/aCASP authorisation: n/a

The authorisation sequence

12–24 mo in practice. The order matters because step two gates the rest.

1
Entity and home jurisdiction

Which legal entity will hold the authorisation and where it is registered with NYDFS.

2
Scope and application

Virtual currency business activity involving New York persons

3
Register publication

Public register entry with a reference number matching the entity name on the application.

4
Ongoing reporting

Reserve, transaction, or conduct reporting depending on the regime and the activity authorised.

NYDFS BitLicense, answered

From real buyer questions. Marked up as FAQPage.

18 companies in the directory report this tag, including Anchorage Digital Bank and Bakkt. Each entry links to the regulator's public register where a reference is supplied.

Virtual currency business activity involving New York persons

The clause that changes product design

Everyone reads complex regimes as a single authorisation. Check which activity the register actually shows — custody, transfer and issuance are frequently separate permissions, and the marketing label rarely matches the register entry exactly.