USDC$74.2B ▲
USDT$121.4B ▲
US→BR median fee0.38% ▼
New listings 7d0
MethodologySign in
Corridors/APAC/HK → CN

Hong Kong to China

1 providers cover Hong Kong → China.

Providers
1
Median all-in
—
Median settle
—
Licensed locally
0
Enquiries 30d
0
to providers on route
Enquiries · 6 months
0no briefs in last 30 days
Scope
Enquiries sent to any of the 1 providers on this route
Last 30 days
0 buyer briefs received
6-month total
0 across 6 months
0
0
0
0
0
0
MayJunJulAugSepOct
Route requirements
✔
Local payout in China
4 payment methods documented across 1 providers.
✔
Hong Kong funding route
1 providers list coverage originating from or into this pair.
◐
Regulatory coverage
No licence claims are published yet — verify directly before contracting.
◐
Disclosed pricing
Median pricing is not yet published — the route is listed but unmeasured on cost.
Post an RFP for this route
The short answerCOMPUTED 28 OCT 2026 · 15:34 UTC

Sending HKD to China on stablecoin rails has live provider coverage, across 1 providers.

Cite: The Stablecoin HQ, HK→CN Corridor, 28 Oct 2026 (n=1 providers)
Methodology
Providers on this routeRanked by verified review score
1
P
PhotonPay✓ VERIFIED
PhotonPay offers multi-asset wallets, stablecoin and fiat acceptance, global payouts, FX and corporate cards from one platform.
Showing 1 of 1 providers
Cost distribution1 providers · all-in, $250K/MO band
0.20–0.35%
0
0.35–0.45%
0
0.45–0.55%
0
0.55–0.70%
0
0.70%+
0
Not disclosed
1

Self-reported pricing at the $250k – $1M band. 0 of 1 providers disclose an all-in fee; 1 have not published pricing at this band yet.

HK → China · corridor briefingRESEARCH DESK12 UNIQUE DATA POINTS · 11% SHARED

What it costs to move HKD to China, and what drives the price

1 providers cover HK → China. 1 document SWIFT on this route.

When spreads are tight, structure separates providers: whether they hold local authorisation, whether FX is locked at quote or at execution, and whether reconciliation output matches your ledger without manual work. Buyers who switch providers usually cite the third, not the first.

Volume changes the answer. Below roughly $250,000 a month, API-first ramps usually win on integration speed and no minimums. Above it, desks with their own local book often price meaningfully tighter and will negotiate.

Providers
1
Median all-in
—
Median settle
—
Locally licensed
0

Which provider type fits your volume

The answer inverts at roughly $250k a month. This is the single most useful rule on this route.

Under $100k / moAPI-first ramps. No minimums, fastest integration, published rates — negotiation is rarely available.
$100k – $250k / moStill ramps, but ask for the volume tier in writing before you assume published pricing applies.
$250k – $1M / moDesks with local liquidity in China often price below ramps here. This is the band where the choice actually changes the number.
Over $1M / moBoth types negotiate and often converge within a few basis points. Decide on FX lock behaviour and reconciliation output instead of price.

Hong Kong → China, answered

From real buyer questions. Marked up as FAQPage.

Only 0 of 1 providers have published an all-in fee on this route so far — shortlist on rail access and authorisation, then compare live quotes.

Median settlement is not yet published across enough listings on this pair — ask each shortlisted provider for a documented credit time on your volume band.

What the median hides

1 of 1 providers on this route have not published an all-in fee yet. That gap often means the route is under-reported rather than expensive — buyers who skip unmeasured corridors sometimes miss the least contested pricing.